Block Interleaver Design for RS codes

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)


A \( (n,k) \) Reed Solomon (RS) encoder, takes \(k\) user data symbols and converts it into a n symbol wide codeword, by adding \(n-k\) parity symbols. The error correcting capability \((t)\) of the RS code is computed as \( t \leq \frac{n-k}{2}\). That is, a RS code with \(n-k\) parity symbols can correct a burst error of upto \(\frac{n-k}{2}\) symbol errors.

Block Interleavers:

Suppose, assume that the dominant error mechanism in a channel is of burst type. A burst of length b is defined as a string of b unreliable consecutive symbols. If the expected burst length, b is less than or equal to t (the number of correctable symbol errors by RS coding), the code can be used as it is. However, if bursts length \(b \gt t\), the error correcting code will fail. This is where interleaving comes to our rescue.

Let us assume that \(b > t\) and \(b \leq t √ó d \), where d (the interleaving depth) is an integer. The Reed-Solomon \((n,k)\) code can be used if we can spread the burst error sequence over several code blocks so that each block has no more than t errors (which can then be corrected). This can be accomplished using block interleaving as follows. Instead of encoding blocks of k symbols and then sending the encoded symbols consecutively, we can interleave the encoded blocks and transmit the interleaved data. In the case where \(n = 255,\; k = 235,\; t = 10,\; d = 5 \),the data bytes output from the Reed-Solomon encoder would appear as shown below , where bytes numbered 0 to 234 are the data bytes and bytes 235 to 254 are the parity check bytes.

Code Structure for Reed Solomon (RS) Codes
Code Structure for Reed Solomon (RS) Codes

Here, the data is written row by row and read back column by column.Consider now the effect of a burst error of length \(b > t\), (where \(t\) is the number of correctable errors per block) and \(b \leq v \times d \) for some \(v\), on the received symbols in the table. Because of the order in which the symbols are sent, a burst length less than or equal to \(d \times i\) will effect at most \(d + 1\) consecutive columns of the table, depending on where the burst starts. Notice that any single row (which corresponds to a codeword) has no more than v errors in it. If \(d \gt t\), these errors are within the error correction capability of the code and can be corrected. In this case, \(d\) becomes the interleaving depth. The trade-off is that extra buffer space is required to store the interleaver table and additional delay is introduced. The worst case burst length determines the size of the table (and the interleaving depth) and the table size determines the amount of buffer space required and the delay.

Design Example:

Consider a (255,235) Reed Solomon coding system. This code can correct upto \(t= \frac{n-k}{2} = 10\) symbols errors. Lets assume that the channel that we are going to use, is expected to cause \(b=253\) symbols. Then the interleaver depth \((d)\) is calculated as

$$ d \gt \frac{b}{t} = \frac{253}{10} = 25.3 $$

In this case , an interleaver depth of 26 is enough to combat the burst errors introduced by the channel. The block interleaver dimensions would be \(d \times n = 26 \times 255 \) (26 rows by 255 columns).

Matlab Code:

A sample matlab code that simulates the above mentioned block interleaver design is given below. The input data is a repeatitive stream of following symbols – “THE_QUICK_BROWN_FOX_JUMPS_OVER_THE_LAZY_DOG_“. A (255,235) Reed Solomon decoder (with correction capability of 10 symbols) is used. We assume that the channel is expected to produce a maximum of consecutive 20 symbols of burst error. The burst errors are denoted by ‘*‘.

Simulation Result:

Given : (255,235) Reed Solomon code can correct : 10 symbols
Given : expected burst error length from the channel : 20 symbols
Interleaving MAY help in this scenario
Input Data to the Interleaver ->

Interleaver Output after being corrupted by 20 symbols burst error – marked by ‘*‘->

Deinterleaver Output->

As we can see from the above simulation that, eventhough the channel introduces 20 symbols of consecutive burst error (which is beyond the correction capability of the RS decoder), the interleaver/deinterleaver operation has effectively distributed the errors and reduced the maximum burst length to 7 symbols (which is easier to correct by (255,235) Reed Solomon code.

See also:

[1] Introduction to Interleavers and deinterleavers
[2] Random Interleavers

Additional Resources:

[1] Notes on theory and construction of Reed Solomon Codes – Bernard Sklar
[2] Concatenation and Advanced Codes – Applications of interleavers- Stanford University

Recommended Books

More Recommended Books at our Integrated Book Store